Javascript must be enabled for the correct page display

Beyond Separation: Applying Trilokī Nātha Madan and Ashis Nandy’s Criticisms of Secularism to Rajeev Bhargava’s Support of this Philosophy in Particular

Wever, Martin (2025) Beyond Separation: Applying Trilokī Nātha Madan and Ashis Nandy’s Criticisms of Secularism to Rajeev Bhargava’s Support of this Philosophy in Particular. Research master thesis, Master Research Master Theologie en Religiewetenschappen.

[img]
Preview
Text
2024-2025-M.-Wever-ReMa.pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

This paper applies itself to Bhikhu Parekh’s observation with regards to the poor state of the Indian intellectual discourse about secularism. We reason that Parekh primarily considers the state of this very discourse poor, because (i) the Indian works and articles brought out about secularism remain relatively isolated from each other and do not add up to a coherent and comprehensive body of philosophical literature, and because (ii) the Indian works and articles published about secularism still not have received the necessary, critical examination from above. This paper decides to combine these very two interpretations of Parekh’s viewpoint and, therefore, on the one hand, brings into conversation with each other Indian advocates and critics of secularism, and, on the other hand, reflects on their works about this very philosophy from above. We do this in particular reference to the support of secularism presented by Rajeev Bhargava (chapter I) and to the criticisms of secularism offered by Trilokī Nātha Madan and Ashis Nandy (chapter II). First, this paper demonstrates that Bhargava, Madan, and Nandy’s positions can each be situated and understood in the context of broader debates about secularism, both in and outside the Indian context. Second, we establish that Madan and Nandy’s general criticisms of secularism can also be applied to many parts and premises of Bhargava’s support of this philosophy in particular. This means that this paper also most importantly aims to think and move beyond separation.

Type: Thesis (Research master)
Supervisors (RUG):
SupervisorE-mailTutor organizationTutor email
Andrejc, G.Faculteit GGW, Christendom en IdeeengeschiedenisG.Andrejc@rug.nl
Mucciarelli, E.Faculteit GGW, Faculteit Godgeleerdheid en Godsdienstwetenschape.mucciarelli@rug.nl
Degree programme: Master Research Master Theologie en Religiewetenschappen
Academic year: 2024-2025
Date of delivery: 03 Feb 2026 10:49
Last modified: 03 Feb 2026 10:49
URI: https://rcs.studenttheses.ub.rug.nl/id/eprint/873
Actions (requires login)
View Item View Item